     |
Science and Technology in China 4910C
Fall 1999 Washington University
Essay
Two: The Three I’s of the Kuomintang’s science efforts
B Y K E
V I N H O
(7
October 1999)
Once the
Kuomintang (KMT) consolidated power in 1928, they came to represent the
‘state’ in Republican China. However, in addition to consolidating political
leadership in China, the KMT moved to consolidate scientific efforts in
China into a single goal-directed entity that served China’s needs in
development. Again along alphabetical lines, then, the KMT’s involvement
directing science in China can be thought of as the Three I’s—ideological
leadership, institutional development that allowed for industrial development
and the pursuit of international involvement in Chinese economic development.
The approach was a top-down and goal directed one that depended on the
co-optation of scientists and the cooperation of the scientific community
in Republican China. Eventually, the line between scientific development
and economic development became deliberately blurred as part of the KMT-directed
“national defense economy.” I would argue that the KMT was most successful
at consolidating ideology and creating the institutions necessary to facilitate
economic growth, but lacked the time and money to accomplish the goals
of industrial development and inviting foreign investment. It remains
important to note that the KMT was not acting within a vacuum. As we have
discussed before, there were other forces at work in China at the time
that should be kept in mind. These influences included the presence of
Western philanthropic organisations and the influence of growing tensions
between China and Japan, but our focus here is the KMT. Despite changing
policies and circumstances confronting China throughout the Republican
Era, the ideal of turning China into a powerful and assertive nation through
scientific and technological prowess was ever present. Therefore, it becomes
an interesting problem to see how strongly this ethic was pushed by the
KMT on Chinese scientists as a function of the circumstances that China
found herself.
In the early 1900s Reardon-Anderson points out that there
was no market for scientists and science in China, and that until after
1905 most students in government schools were “distracted by the lure
of classical studies,” which would assure students a government job. (Reardon-Anderson
1991, 61) However, after the first generation of Boxer Indemnity scientists
returned from their studies abroad and as scientific institutions became
more sophisticated, an influx of science hit China by the 1920s. Science
went from being a non-marketable field into a dynamic field filled with
potential. With this new influx came the questions of where to take science,
of which sciences to promote, and what purposes science should be used
for. Ideological debates took place in the pages of various emergent scientific
journals and at conferences, gradually science became politicized as the
potential for the development of a modern China via science was realized.
(see Reardon-Anderson 91-93) Therefore, science up until the KMT consolidation
can be thought of a loosely confederated group of scientists working with
different intentions and purposes that all generally went towards the
vague goal of improving China.
This all changed significantly in 1928 as the KMT victory
produced a “government determined to place science and technology at the
service of the nation.” (Reardon-Anderson 177) Added to this crystallization
of a science-oriented national policy was the influx of the second generation
of scientists returning from abroad. One of the realizations the KMT arrived
at early on in its history was that modernization and creating a strong
state entailed an economic base that relied on science to foster industry
and self-defense. (see Gasster 45, Kirby 1989, 25, Reardon-Anderson 190)
Institutionally the KMT government pursued this policy by creating several
organizations such as the Academia Sinica, the Peking Academy and various
other research institutes and universities to coordinate and direct scientific
efforts in the country. Such organizations as the National Institute for
Compilation and Translation were established to promote and facilitate
the importation of Western science into China. Eventually the Ministry
of Education was characterized as being the most “powerful and purposeful”
exponent of educational reform that China had known. This was evidenced
by the fact that by 1937 more than half of Chinese college students had
majored in a science or applied scientists. (Reardon-Anderson 181 &
190) Also interesting was the fact that government also promoted a certain
type of idealism that appealed to the “brain drain” scientists to return
to China to help build up the country.
The early ideological debate went on to become the
full-fledged debate between the May Fourth liberals and the Kuomintang
conservatives within the government. Eventually, this debate was resolved
by the government only funding practical and applied science. This was
reflected in the allocation of resources (i.e. money and research initiatives)
by the Ministry of Education towards applied science. Indeed, specific
regulations implemented in 1929, 1933 and 1935, even dictated that a certain
proportion of Chinese university level students had to major in a natural
or applied science. (see Reardon-Anderson 215) While the Ministry of Education
was tightening up the educational infrastructure by pushing science education
throughout the curriculum, other government agencies hampering overall
progress by going off in different directions. An awareness o this emerges
in a 1929 annual report that cited that different parts of the government
were spending their allocations on their own “pet projects” that lacked
coordination. (Kirby 1984, 82) Bearing this in mind we see that there
was need for central planning to achieve modernization for China. This
planning took place the early 1930s.
As science became more sophisticated and as concerns over
Japan grew, the government began to push science towards pragmatic concerns.
The KMT did so by creating such organizations such as the National Defense
Planning Commission, which was founded in 1932 after the Kwantung Division
of the Japanese Army had seized Manchuria in 1931. The commission was
headed by the noted geologist Weng Wen-hao, which was characteristic of
the KMT’s predilection for including technical specialists in its planning
apparatuses. (Kirby 1984, 78) These organizations, such as the National
Economic Council and the Independent Critic the reflected the diversity
of the KMT and included various political opinions and expert scientists
who despite sharing differences in opinion, were working towards the common
KMT goal of developing a strong China. Eventually, these organizations
laid out plans to build up such physical plant as steel works or power
plants that were to aid in the development of specific industries and
public works. (see Kirby 1984, 96) The thought being that centralized
planning through agendas like the Three-Year Plan was essential to rapid
and directed industrial development.
By developing
the Geological Institute within the auspices of the Ministry of Industry
and having entities as the National Resources Commission the KMT government
was paving the way for industry as well foreign investment in China’s
vast previously untapped mineral resources. (Yang 70) However, these efforts
weren’t terribly successful. The Eurasia Aviation Corporation is used
by Kirby as an example of the culmination of KMT efforts of a state-owned
entity that had close ties with foreign interests, in this case German
airline interests. Kirby also highlights the how Eurasia corporation was
an example of an entity that became hamstrung due to inter-governmental
bureaucracy. (Kirby 1984, 76) But generally, the type of deal that was
struck with the Germans (and other Western countries) was one based on
barter. An example of this deal was that the Germans would give the Chinese
the technical knowledge and the on-site aid needed to develop a weapons
industry among others, in exchange for tungsten mining rights in China.
(Ibid, 212) In addition to the “extortionism” the state showed towards
private enterprise in Shanghai, Kirby offers that Nanking consciously
directed foreign investment towards state run enterprises. Foreign investment
and domestic capital often fell short of expectations and the well-developed
plans never came to fruition. This was not only due to a lack of confidence
on the part of Chinese investors out of fears that their investment would
become nationalized, but out of war with Japan starting in 1937.
© 1999, Kevin K. Ho
|